Armchair Apocalypse: Nicanor Continues His Journey

Nicanor is the main character in our short historical fiction episodes showing how the Book of Revelation may have first traveled from Patmos in the Aegean Sea in the first century to the churches in Asia Minor—and eventually to the whole world and people in every age since.

During this “Armchair Apocalypse” series, we’ll follow Nicanor on his travels to better understand the Book of Revelation by exploring the people and the times in which it was first revealed.


Nicanor and the Road Beyond Smyrna

The last words of John’s letter still hung in the crowded upstairs room.

No one spoke for several moments. Below them, Smyrna continued as if nothing had happened. Merchants shouted in the street. Carts rattled over stone. Somewhere near the harbor, a priest called citizens to offer incense for the emperor. Rome’s noise had not stopped—but something inside the room had changed.

At dawn, Nicanor rolled the scroll carefully, wrapped it against the sea air, and placed it inside his leather bag. His next destination was Pergamum. As he tightened the strap, the church’s elder, a gray-bearded man named Justus, handed him bread, dried figs, and a small flask of water.

“John wrote that we will have tribulation,” Nicanor said. “Some in the room looked frightened. Do they believe something worse is coming?”

Justus glanced toward the street. “Something worse is always coming when men worship power. But tribulation is already here.”

He picked up an olive from the morning meal and pressed it between his fingers. “The word John used means pressure—the kind that crushes grapes or olives until what is inside comes out. Rome applies that pressure every day. Honor Caesar. Join the feast. Offer the incense. Call him lord. Most people think it is harmless. A pinch of incense, a few words, and everyone goes home happy.”

“Except those who refuse,” Nicanor said.

“Exactly. A merchant may lose his customers. A craftsman may be pushed out of his guild. A family may lose its home. Some will be imprisoned. Some may die.” Justus looked back toward the room where several believers still slept. “Tribulation reveals what is inside us. Fear—or faithfulness.”

Nicanor thought about the phrase “ten days” from Johns letter. “Does John mean their suffering will last only ten days?”

“Perhaps. Perhaps it is a symbol, like much of the vision. Daniel and his friends were tested for ten days. Whatever John means, the message is clear: the suffering has a limit. Rome does not decide how the story ends.”

Nicanor lifted the bag onto his shoulder. “Then how should they prepare?”

Justus smiled faintly. “Not by hiding in caves with baskets of grain.”

He pointed toward the believers upstairs. “We prepare by knowing who we belong to before the pressure comes. We feed the families of prisoners. We care for those who lose work. We teach our children that Caesar is not Lord. We refuse to become cruel when cruel men rule us. And when one of us becomes afraid, the others stand beside him.”

Nicanor looked north toward the road to Pergamum. Another city. Another church. Another place where Roman power demanded what belonged only to God.

Justus gripped his arm before he left. “Tell them in Pergamum what you saw here.”

“What did I see?”

“A frightened church listening to a dangerous letter,” Justus said, “and deciding to remain faithful anyway.”

Nicanor stepped into the waking street. Behind him stood Smyrna, proud, wealthy, and loyal to Rome. Ahead waited Pergamum, where John had written that Satan’s throne stood.

Tribulation, Nicanor now understood, was not merely a disaster scheduled for some later time or distant generation. It was the pressure every empire applied when it demanded the heart, mind, and obedience of God’s people.

The faithful prepared for it by deciding—before the pressure came—whom they would worship.

Saturday Watchdog: The Antichrist Is Coming for Your Artificial Intelligence

Peter Thiel Connects AI Regulation to the Antichrist

Technology investor Peter Thiel is making headlines following the release of recordings from his private Nashville lectures on the Antichrist.

According to reporting published October 8, Thiel argues that fears surrounding artificial intelligence could help justify the creation of an authoritarian world government. – October 8 report on Thiel’s Nashville lectures

He has criticized Pope Leo XIV and former President Barack Obama for their concerns about AI.

Thiel’s argument connects technological regulation, global political authority and his interpretation of biblical end-times prophecy. His lectures also discuss the mysterious restraining force described in 2 Thessalonians 2. Gizmodo

Apparently, the Antichrist now works in AI regulation.

We’ve all heard similar predictions before.

The Antichrist has supposedly been a pope, Napoleon, Hitler, various American presidents and just about every powerful European politician.

Now we’re adding people who want to regulate artificial intelligence. But, the word antichrist never appears in Revelation. John uses it in his letters, including this remarkable statement:

John wasn’t describing a single futuristic technology regulator, he was warning about people already active in his own time.

Thiel’s arguments demonstrate how biblical prophecy is being incorporated into modern debates about technology, political authority and global governance.

Why don’t we first consider how the Book of Revelation would have been understood by the people it was first written to about 2000 years ago?

Armchair Apocalypse: Trouble Ahead? Tribulation Part Four

Part Four: Is a Future Great Tribulation Still Coming?

After looking at Revelation, Jewish history, and Jesus’ warning about Jerusalem, one question remains: Does the Bible predict another Great Tribulation at the end of history?

Possibly—but the popular seven-year scenario is not spelled out as clearly as many prophecy charts suggest.

The seven years come primarily from Daniel 9:24–27. Daniel describes “seventy weeks,” usually understood as seventy groups of seven. Futurist interpreters separate the final “week” from the first sixty-nine and place it at the end of history. That last week becomes a seven-year Tribulation, often divided into two three-and-a-half-year periods.

Revelation does mention 42 months, 1,260 days, and “a time, and times, and half a time”—different ways of describing approximately three and a half years. But it never directly identifies these periods as two halves of Daniel’s final week or calls their combined length the Great Tribulation.

That connection is an interpretation, not a quotation.

Christians generally approach these passages in several ways. Futurists expect a final period of worldwide suffering before Christ returns. Preterists believe most tribulation prophecies were fulfilled through first-century persecution and Jerusalem’s destruction. Idealists see tribulation as the recurring struggle between God’s kingdom and oppressive human powers. Many scholars take a blended approach: the prophecies addressed real first-century events, established patterns repeated throughout history, and may still point toward a final confrontation.

The New Testament certainly warns that evil, persecution, deception, and rebellion will continue. It also teaches that Christ will return, the dead will be raised, evil will be judged, and God’s kingdom will finally fill creation. What it does not give us is a tidy end-times spreadsheet with every event placed in an uncontested slot.

Jesus gave His followers a simpler warning:

That promise applies whether tribulation comes through Rome, religious persecution, war, dictatorship, cultural pressure, or some final crisis still ahead.

So What?

Interpretation asks what these passages meant within their original Jewish and Roman settings. Application asks how believers should live when the same pressures appear again.

The answer is not panic, date-setting, or treating every international crisis like the opening scene of Left Behind. It is faithfulness.

Perhaps a final Great Tribulation is coming. Perhaps some familiar prophecy systems have assembled the details incorrectly. Either way, Jesus never told His followers to build their lives around escaping hardship.

He told them to endure, remain awake, and trust that no empire, Beast, or tribulation gets the final word.

Armchair Apocalypse: Tribulation Part Three

What Did Jesus Mean by “Great Tribulation”?

Well before the Book of Revelation was written, Jesus warned His disciples about a coming time of terrible suffering:

This verse is often treated as a prediction about the final years before Christ returns. But Jesus did not deliver it during a lecture about twenty-first-century world politics. He was answering a question about the future of Jerusalem and its Temple.

The conversation began when the disciples admired the Temple buildings. Jesus responded that not one stone would be left upon another. Naturally, they wanted to know when this would happen.

Jesus warned them about false messiahs, wars, famines, earthquakes, persecution, and Jerusalem’s approaching destruction. When danger arrived, those living in Judea were told to flee to the mountains. They were not told to identify the Antichrist, calculate seven years, or upload an emergency prophecy podcast. They were told to get out.

Luke’s version is even more direct:

That happened in the Jewish revolt against Rome. In AD 70, Roman forces captured Jerusalem, destroyed the Temple, and inflicted enormous suffering on the people trapped inside the city. For Jesus’ disciples—and certainly for those who survived the siege—this was not a rehearsal for tribulation. It was tribulation.

Jesus also said, “This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled” (Matthew 24:34). That statement is difficult to explain if everything in the chapter refers exclusively to events thousands of years later.

Does that mean Matthew 24 has nothing to say about the future? Not necessarily. Biblical prophecy sometimes joins a near historical judgment with the larger themes of final judgment and God’s ultimate victory. Jesus’ language eventually reaches beyond Jerusalem to His coming, the gathering of His people, and the need to remain watchful.

That is why Christians read the passage differently. Some believe nearly all of it was fulfilled in the first century. Others see the fall of Jerusalem as an early fulfillment that foreshadows a greater final crisis. Futurists place most of the chapter near the end of history.

So What?

Whatever position we take, we shouldn’t skip the setting. Jesus gave this warning to real disciples about a real city, a real Temple, and a catastrophe that would occur within their historical world.

The destruction of Jerusalem shows what “great tribulation” looks like when violent empire, human rebellion, and divine judgment collide.

In Part Four, we’ll examine whether the Bible also points to a final worldwide Tribulation—and where the popular seven-year timeline actually comes from.

Armchair Apocalypse: Tribulation – Part Two

Tribulation Before Revelation

When John wrote about “great tribulation,” he wasn’t introducing a brand-new end-times idea. His Jewish readers already had centuries of history—and several biblical passages—shaping how they heard the word.

In the Hebrew Scriptures, tribulation usually means severe distress brought on by war, invasion, persecution, exile, or judgment. It wasn’t necessarily the official name of one future event. It was what happened when a nation or its people were squeezed to the breaking point.

Jeremiah described one such crisis:

“Jacob” means Israel. In context, Jeremiah is describing national disaster, captivity, and suffering—but also promising restoration. Some modern prophecy systems move “Jacob’s trouble” entirely into a future Tribulation. Others connect it primarily to Israel’s historical exile and oppression. Either way, the verse’s central movement is easy to miss: trouble is followed by rescue.

Daniel 12:1 uses similar language, predicting “a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation.” The passage grew out of a world in which God’s people knew exactly what violent empires could do. Jews had endured Babylon’s destruction of Jerusalem, forced exile, and later the brutal persecution associated with Antiochus IV, who outlawed Jewish practices and desecrated the Temple.

By John’s lifetime, Rome was adding another chapter. Roman armies destroyed Jerusalem and its Temple in AD 70 after a horrific siege. Ancient accounts describe starvation, bloodshed, and mass death. For Jewish families who lived through it—or lost relatives in it—that certainly qualified as great tribulation. No imagination or prophecy chart required.

Jewish teaching also came to speak of intense suffering before God’s deliverance as the “birth pains of the Messiah.” The image came from the prophets: war, fear, and upheaval were compared to a woman in labor. Labor is painful, but it moves toward something—the birth of a new reality.

So What?

That background helps us understand Revelation. John’s images of beasts, war, famine, persecution, and judgment were not random scenes from a supernatural disaster movie. They drew upon Israel’s long experience of suffering under kingdoms that acted as though they were untouchable. Yet those kingdoms always fell.

For John’s Jewish readers, tribulation meant real suffering, but it did not mean God had lost control. It was the darkness before deliverance, the labor before birth, and the pressure through which faithfulness was tested.

Next, we’ll look at what Jesus meant when He warned His disciples about “great tribulation” in Matthew 24.

Bible Rebel September Newsletter: Is Jesus A Republican?

A new national political debate is emerging around candidates such as Texas Democrat James Talarico, Florida state Rep. Angie Nixon and Michigan’s Abdul El-Sayed, who are explicitly incorporating faith into their campaigns. Detroit pastor Lorenzo Sewell accused progressive candidates today of “virtue-signaling” to Christian voters rather than authentically representing biblical Christianity.
See story here.

For decades, Republicans have enjoyed something close to ownership of America’s public Christian vocabulary. That may be changing, and that would be a good thing.

Let Republicans quote Jesus. Let Democrats quote Jesus.

Phillipians 1:15-18

Some indeed preach Christ even of envy and strife; and some also of good will:
The one preach Christ of contention, not sincerely, supposing to add affliction to my bonds:
But the other of love, knowing that I am set for the defence of the gospel.
What then? notwithstanding, every way, whether in pretence, or in truth, Christ is preached; and I therein do rejoice, yea, and will rejoice.

Listen to them all then open the Bible and check them all.

Jesus isn’t Republican or Democrat, and Scripture shouldn’t be retrofitted to whichever political platform we already support.

Rick Tryon
Editor/Publisher Bible Rebel


August/September Highlights

Armchair Apocalypse: What About Those Four Horsemen?

Spiritual Wickedness In High Places

They Said It: Four Quotes On The Book Of Haggai

Video Mini Message: Don’t Fear Death

Ten-episode Bible 101 video series completed

Watchdog Alert: Should AI Tell You What The Bible Means?

Nightclub Church?


Coming in September/October

More of our Armchair Apocalypse series.

“Your Life and What Comes After” book available.

More in-depth content on deeper biblical studies and theological issues.

More Video Mini Messages like this – What Is Heaven?

You can find all of the current Bible 101 episodes and One-Minute Mini Messages here on our YouTube Channel, and you can subscribe to our YouTube channel here.

We’ll also be continuing our regular features, guest articles, and series:

  • Your Life And What Comes After: Plugging Into God’s Forever Plan Now
  • Armchair Apocalypse
  • They Said It: Poignant quotes on a variety of topics
  • Guest articles
  • And more…

Watchdogs

As always, we’ll be keeping a watchdogs eye on all of the latest political, religious, biblical archaeology, and cultural news and events from around the world and bringing to you in bite-size chunks to keep you informed.


Finally, are you interested in contributing content to Bible Rebel?

Bible Rebel is always looking for interesting, compatible content for our biblerebel.com website/blog. We are accepting writing and video submissions for review and possible publication on our platform.

If you have a teaching series, opinion piece, research piece or other content that fits with the Bible Rebel mission we’d like to see it!

If your content fits our mission and creed, included below, then email it to us at in**@********el.com. Written pieces should be no more than 500 words and video content no longer than 7 minutes – either can be submitted as part of a longer series for consideration.

Thanks, and stay tuned for our next newsletter.

Oh, and please go over and give us a follow on Facebook and X (formerly Twitter).

Armchair Apocalypse: What Is ‘Great Tribulation’

We’ll be looking closely at questions and answers about “The Great Tribulation” in a four-part series, starting with Part One here.

Part One: Does Revelation Actually Describe a Seven-Year Tribulation?

Ask most prophecy teachers about the Great Tribulation and you’ll probably get a detailed seven-year timeline involving the Antichrist, the Beast, global war, and judgments arriving one after another.

You might even get a chart.

But if we’re going to understand Revelation, we should begin with what the book actually says—not with the chart.

The phrase “great tribulation” appears in Revelation 7:14, where John sees a huge crowd standing before God:

The Greek word translated “tribulation,” thlipsis, means pressure, distress, affliction, or suffering. It was not a special word reserved only for a future end-times disaster. In fact, John opens Revelation by calling himself his readers’ “companion in tribulation” (Revelation 1:9).

The believers in Smyrna were also experiencing tribulation and were warned that some of them would be imprisoned (Revelation 2:9–10). In Pergamum, a believer named Antipas had already been killed (Revelation 2:13).

For those Christians, tribulation wasn’t a theological theory. They lived under Roman authority in cities where emperor worship was part of public life. Refusing to honor Caesar and the Roman gods could cost them friendships, employment, freedom, or life itself.

Revelation does mention periods of 42 months, 1,260 days, and “a time, times, and half a time.” Each equals approximately three and a half years and draws from the symbolic language of Daniel. What Revelation does not do is combine two of those periods, call the result seven years, and name it “the Great Tribulation.”

The familiar seven-year scenario comes from connecting Revelation with a particular interpretation of Daniel’s seventieth week and several other passages. That may be a valid theological argument, but readers should know that the complete system is assembled from several texts. It is not plainly laid out in Revelation.

So What?

John’s first readers probably weren’t calculating how many years remained before suffering began. They were trying to remain faithful while suffering was already happening.

That changes the question. Instead of beginning with, “When will the Great Tribulation happen?” perhaps we should first ask:

What did tribulation mean within the Jewish and biblical world John’s readers already knew?

We’ll look at that in Part Two.

Armchair Apocalypse: What Is The Beast?

The Monster With Seven Heads Had an Address

Imagine being a Christian in first-century Asia Minor. Roman banners hang over your city. Coins carry the emperor’s image. Temples praise Caesar. Soldiers enforce his laws. Rome controls politics, trade, religion, and public life.

Then John’s Revelation is read aloud:

Nobody in the room asks, “Could this be a twenty-first-century president, celebrity, or tech mogul?”

They already know what the monster looks like.

John builds the Beast from the creatures in Daniel 7, where terrifying animals symbolize kingdoms that conquer and oppress. His Beast has features of a leopard, bear, and lion—as if history’s worst empires had been stitched together into one giant political monster.

For John’s readers, that monster was Roman imperial power.

Rome claimed to bring peace and civilization, but it maintained that “peace” through armies, executions, slavery, and fear. Emperors accepted divine honors, and anyone refusing to play along could be viewed as disloyal. The Beast represents the Empire as a system, although individual emperors—especially the brutal Nero—could become the human face of that system.

Revelation 17 provides another enormous clue: the Beast’s seven heads represent seven mountains and seven kings. Rome was famously associated with seven hills. John wasn’t tossing random monsters into a religious horror movie. He was exposing Rome’s spiritual identity.

There is also a second beast, rising from the land. It looks somewhat like a lamb but speaks like the Dragon, Satan, from whom the Beasts get their power and marching orders. It represents the local religious and political machinery that encouraged people to honor Rome and worship imperial power. In modern terms, the first Beast wielded the sword; the second handled the propaganda.

Mainstream biblical scholarship broadly places these images within the world of Roman rule. Futurist interpreters often expect a final ruler who will display the same characteristics, but the Beast’s original identity cannot simply be removed from the first century and turned into one man waiting at the end of history.

So What?

Revelation’s imagery had a meaning before it had a modern application. Rome had become a beastly empire by demanding the loyalty and worship that belonged to God.

Its continuing application: Any nation, ideology, institution, or leader can become beastlike when power becomes sacred, truth becomes optional, and people are crushed for refusing to conform.

The Beast doesn’t need seven literal heads, it only needs people willing to worship power.

Armchair Apocalypse: 666 Isn’t A Microchip

Remember, Revelation is a vision—not a play-by-play preview of tomorrow’s headlines.

John communicates through symbols, Old Testament imagery, dramatic contrasts, and strange creatures because he is revealing the spiritual reality behind earthly events. That doesn’t mean Revelation has nothing to say about the future.

It means we shouldn’t treat every symbol as a literal piece of technology waiting to be invented. The first question is not, “What modern gadget does this predict?” but, “What did this vision reveal to the Christians who first received it?”

666 Wasn’t a Barcode

Mention the Mark of the Beast, and somebody will immediately point at microchips, vaccines, credit cards, or whatever technology frightened their uncle on Facebook last week.

But what would John’s original readers have understood?

Revelation was written to seven churches living under the shadow of the Roman Empire. Rome demanded more than taxes—it demanded loyalty. Emperors were honored as divine, their images appeared on coins, and civic festivals and trade associations often involved sacrifices to Rome’s gods. Refusing to participate could cost Christians business, social standing, and sometimes their lives.

The Greek word translated “mark” is charagma: an engraved, stamped, or branded sign. John places it on the forehead or right hand, probably as a deliberate counterfeit of God’s seal upon His people in Revelation 7. It also echoes Deuteronomy 6, where God’s commands are symbolically placed on the hand and forehead.

The message is about ownership and allegiance: Who shapes your thinking—your forehead? Whose will do you carry out—your hand?

Then Comes 666

Ancient letters also functioned as numbers, allowing names to be expressed as numerical totals—a practice called gematria. The leading historical explanation is that “Nero Caesar,” written in Hebrew letters, totals 666. An ancient manuscript variation reads 616, which fits a shorter Latin spelling of Nero’s name. That is strong evidence John was pointing toward Nero—or using the famously brutal emperor as the model for Rome’s “beastly” power. Bible Odyssey

Most contemporary scholars agree that Revelation 13 must first be interpreted within this Roman setting, although they disagree over whether it also predicts a particular end-times ruler. But it’s important to remember that the symbols and images in John’s vision would have to have meaning and relevance to God’s people in all ages until the end.

The mark was not presented as something people would receive accidentally while buying groceries. It represented knowingly choosing the beast’s system over faithfulness to God.

That is interpretation: what John communicated to his original audience.

Application asks how that truth confronts other generations. The beast’s mark can appear in different forms whenever governments, cultures, institutions, or economic systems demand the kind of loyalty that belongs to God alone.

So What?

So don’t waste your life hunting for three sixes hidden in a company logo. Ask the better question:

What pressure could make you trade truth for acceptance, comfort, money, or safety?

That is where the beast still leaves its mark.

Armchair Apocalypse: Nicanor And The Horsemen

Nicanor is the main character in our short historical fiction episodes showing how the Book of Revelation may have first traveled from Patmos in the Aegean Sea in the first century to the churches in Asia Minor—and eventually to the whole world and people in every age since.

During this “Armchair Apocalypse” series, we’ll follow Nicanor on his travels to better understand the Book of Revelation by exploring the people and the times in which it was first revealed.


Nicanor heard the horses before he saw them. Hooves struck the hard Roman road north of Ephesus, and he instinctively moved aside. Four Roman soldiers appeared around the bend, mounted and armed, their cloaks shifting in the afternoon wind. Nicanor lowered his eyes and pulled his own cloak tighter around the leather-wrapped scroll hidden beneath it. John’s Revelation. If the wrong Roman decided to search him, his trip to Smyrna could end considerably sooner than planned. As the riders passed, however, another image flashed through his mind: four horses—white, red, black and pale.

Nicanor had lived long enough to know that armies rarely arrived alone. He remembered soldiers entering a village when he was younger—the shouting, terrified families, grain taken from storerooms, animals slaughtered, fields abandoned. Conquest came first. Then violence. Then hunger. Then death. Suddenly John’s strange vision didn’t seem strange at all. The white rider went forth conquering. The red rider took peace from the earth. The black rider carried scales while food became ruinously expensive. And the pale horse followed them all, carrying the simplest and ugliest name imaginable: Death.

People hearing Revelation in the churches of Asia Minor didn’t need a prophecy seminar to understand that sequence. Rome celebrated military conquest, while the feared Parthians beyond Rome’s eastern frontier were famous mounted archers—the sort of warriors John’s bow-carrying horseman could immediately bring to mind. War could devastate crops and disrupt grain supplies. John’s black horse described wheat costing about an entire day’s wage for a day’s food. Imagine working all day just to buy enough bread to survive until tomorrow. That wasn’t spooky symbolism to John’s audience. It was nightmare economics.

The soldiers disappeared down the road, leaving only dust behind them. Nicanor finally exhaled. He understood something modern readers sometimes miss: John wasn’t inventing monsters to scare people two thousand years later. He was taking realities his first readers already feared—conquest, bloodshed, famine and death—and turning them into four unforgettable riders. The imagery also reached deeper into Israel’s Scriptures, where sword, famine, pestilence and beasts were familiar images of judgment.

Nicanor touched the scroll beneath his cloak and continued toward Smyrna. Rome looked unstoppable. Its soldiers rode the roads. Its emperors ruled nations. Its armies conquered kingdoms. But in John’s vision, even the horsemen didn’t ride whenever they pleased. The Lamb opened the seals. That was the real message.

Nicanor smiled.

Rome wasn’t running history after all.