Armchair Apocalypse: Who Or What Is The Antichrist – Part Two

Hollywood’s Big Myth

Mention “the Antichrist,” and most people picture a slick global dictator, the son of Satan, running the United Nations while plotting world domination. Throw in a creepy kid named Damien, a barcode or implanted microchip, and dramatic background music, and you’ve basically got pop culture’s version of the end times.

But come on, that’s not actually what the Bible says.

Much of our modern picture comes from movies like The Omen (1976), Rosemary’s Baby (1968), Hal Lindsey’s Late Great Planet Earth, and later the Left Behind novels and films, where the charismatic politician Nicolae Carpathia became the Antichrist for an entire generation. These stories are entertaining, but they blend together different biblical characters and centuries of theological tradition into one supervillain. (Wikipedia)

As I outlined previously, though, the word “antichrist” never appears in the Book of Revelation. Not even once.

Instead, John uses the word only in his letters (1 John 2:18, 22; 4:3; 2 John 7), where he says that “many antichrists” were already present in his own day. He describes people who denied that Jesus is the Christ—not a future global emperor waiting for his movie trailer.

A Little History

So where did the famous end-times Antichrist come from?

Over the centuries, Christian writers gradually combined several different biblical figures into one character:

  • John’s antichrists (false teachers).
  • Paul’s “man of lawlessness” (2 Thessalonians 2).
  • Daniel’s little horn (Daniel 7).
  • Revelation’s Beast from the sea (Revelation 13).

By the Middle Ages, this blended figure had become a detailed legend. Modern prophecy books, novels, and films later turned that legend into the polished villain many people know today.

The Bible certainly speaks of wicked rulers. Pharaoh opposed God. Nebuchadnezzar exalted himself. Antiochus IV Epiphanes persecuted God’s people. Nero brutally attacked Christians.

Revelation also portrays the Beast as a blasphemous, persecuting political power, which many scholars understand primarily as an empire or imperial system rather than a single individual. But Scripture doesn’t simply hand us Hollywood’s single, all-in-one Antichrist character. It presents several different figures serving different purposes in different books.

So What?

The Bible’s main message isn’t, “Pin the tail on the Antichrist.” It’s, “Patiently wait for the King and the Kingdom.”

Remain faithful and watchful. Remain unafraid.

The Hollywood and pop-culture bogey man called the Antichrist is a manufactured, unbiblical creation that gets far too much attention. Don’t let it have yours.

Thursday Watchdog: Clear, Simple Eschatology

Believing in an invisible return of Jesus, an invisible worldwide “scooping up” of believers to be taken away somewhere, followed by seven years of Hollywood apocalypse scenarios, then a third coming of Jesus, is a remarkable example of scriptural interpretive contortionism.

Where exactly does the Bible clearly and explicitly teach:

  • an invisible return of Jesus,
  • an invisible worldwide “scooping up” of believers to be taken away somewhere,
  • seven years of apocalypse scenarios,
  • then a third coming of Jesus,

as a comprehensive, clear eschatology?

You have to take each of those elements and mash them together through private interpretation, connecting dots that Scripture does not connect, and using convoluted charts and timelines to arrive at the Hal Lindsey/John Nelson Darby/Left Behind version of dispensational theology known as the Secret Rapture.

Fictional novels, ear-tickling, speculative end-time scenarios, and Hollywood treatments of Scripture shouldn’t influence our attempts to rightly divide and understand God’s Word when it comes to such important matters.

The return of Jesus Christ is a singular event, followed by the establishment of the promised Kingdom, and ultimately the eternal Kingdom. It’s simple, clear, and doesn’t require fifteen different eschatological formulas or confusing doctrines of human tradition to understand or anticipate with great hope.

Rethinking The Rapture: Another Look At N.T. Wright

Continuing our ‘Rethinking The Rapture’ series, I want to revisit N.T. Wright’s ‘Farewell to the Rapture” essay.

Here, Wright addresses the image of believers being suctioned up into the air and taken away to heaven at the return of Christ, as popularized in modern novels and movies:

“…Paul conjures up images of an emperor visiting a colony or province.  The citizens go out to meet him in open country and then escort him into the city.  Paul’s image of the people “meeting the Lord in the air” should be read with the assumption that the people will immediately turn around and lead the Lord back to the newly remade world.

Paul’s mixed metaphors of trumpets blowing and the living being snatched into heaven to meet the Lord are not to be understood as literal truth, as the Left Behind series suggests, but as a vivid and biblically allusive description of the great transformation of the present world of which he speaks elsewhere.”

Wright makes another very poignant observation about the current worldview of some Christians who believe, wrongly in my opinion, that scripture teaches that believers will be scooped up to avoid a ‘Great Tribulation’, then return seven years later with Jesus to dish out the final portion of God’s wrath on the world.

Paul’s misunderstood metaphors present a challenge for us: How can we reuse biblical imagery, including Paul’s, so as to clarify the truth, not distort it?  And how can we do so, as he did, in such a way as to subvert the political imagery of the dominant and dehumanizing empires of our world?  We might begin by asking, What view of the world is sustained, even legitimized, by the Left Behind ideology?  How might it be confronted and subverted by genuinely biblical thinking?  For a start, is not the Left Behind mentality in thrall to a dualistic view of reality that allows people to pollute God’s world on the grounds that it’s all going to be destroyed soon?  Wouldn’t this be overturned if we recaptured Paul’s wholistic vision of God’s whole creation?

Let’s allow the whole Word of God to speak to us and teach us rather than magnifying pet verses out of context and being seduced by pop theology – like Left Behind.

Rethinking The Rapture: Introduction

Rethinking The Rapture: Questions

Rethinking The Rapture: More Questions

Rethinking The Rapture: N.T. Wright’s ‘Farewell to the Rapture’

Rethinking The Rapture: What 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 Doesn’t Say

Rethinking The Rapture: Millions Of Christians Were Not Delivered From Wrath

Rethinking The Rapture: What Does ‘Delivered From Wrath’ Mean?

Rethinking The Rapture: What Does ‘Delivered From Wrath’ Mean? Part 2

Rethinking The Rapture: In The Twinkling Of An Eye

Rethinking The Rapture: Matthew 24:40-42

Rethinking The Rapture: N.T. Wright’s ‘Farewell to the Rapture’ Redux

Rethinking The Rapture: Send In The Clouds?