Saturday Watchdog: 47 Dead in Haiti. Christians Should Be Paying Attention

While much of America argues about politics and whatever outrage is trending today, Christians in Haiti are burying their dead.

On August 23, about 150 heavily armed gang members attacked Kenscoff, in the mountains above Port-au-Prince. According to the Associated Press and the United Nations, 47 people were killed and more than 50 kidnapped. Thirty-four people were killed inside or around a church where residents had sought refuge. This week, mourners returned to that same church to bury members of their families. (AP News)

Christian outlets report that the attack centered on the Ark of the New Testament evangelical church, where displaced families had taken shelter, and that many of those killed were Christians. At least five of the dead were children. (CBN)

We should be careful with the word persecution. Haiti’s gangs murder, kidnap and terrorize people indiscriminately, and current reporting does not conclusively establish that every victim was killed because he or she was Christian.

But it isn’t debatable that people seeking safety inside a Christian church were slaughtered there.

Meanwhile, followers of Jesus elsewhere in the world can argue about worship styles, denominations, doctrines, and whether the coffee in the lobby is any good.

But let’s all try to remeber this exortation from Hebrews, because it resonates and reminds us that our comfortable Christianity here in America isn’t neccesarily the norm.

Our brothers and sisters aren’t merely the people sitting beside us Sunday morning. The Body of Christ crosses borders, languages and oceans.

So What?

So today, pray for Haiti. Pray for the kidnapped. Pray for grieving families. Pray for Christians trying to remain faithful in a country where simply gathering together can put them in mortal danger.

And remember them, because much of the world won’t.

They Said It: Four Quotes On The Book Of Haggai

Here are four thoughtful quotes from four different voices on Haggai:

Warren W. Wiersbe — on the excuses the people made for postponing God’s work:

Charles Spurgeon — on Haggai’s command to “consider your ways”:

J. Alec Motyer — on the returned exiles’ misplaced priorities:

    David Guzik — on God’s response once the people finally obeyed:

      Haggai’s message is remarkably contemporary: Stop making spiritual-sounding excuses, take a hard look at your priorities, and then do something about them.

      Thursday Watchdog: Pastors And Politics

      America’s largest United Methodist church sends its pastor into politics

      Adam Hamilton, founder and senior pastor of the 25,000-member Church of the Resurrection, is the Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in deeply Republican Kansas. AP reports today that Hamilton intends to continue preaching 12–18 times a year if elected, following the unusual model of Georgia Sen. Raphael Warnock.

      His theology is already campaign ammunition: opponents are highlighting a 2022 sermon in which Hamilton suggested salvation may be possible for non-Christians. Hmmm, interesting, that.

      So, can someone simultaneously be a shepherd of Christ’s church and a partisan politician? Yeah, I think so. After all politics and religion have a lot in common, right?

      And when opponents challenge a pastor’s theology during an election, Christians shouldn’t automatically dismiss that as dirty politics. If a man publicly teaches what Jesus said about salvation, we’re allowed to open the Bible and check.

      Political affiliation doesn’t determine theological truth…except when it does.

      Armchair Apocalypse: 666 Isn’t A Microchip

      Remember, Revelation is a vision—not a play-by-play preview of tomorrow’s headlines.

      John communicates through symbols, Old Testament imagery, dramatic contrasts, and strange creatures because he is revealing the spiritual reality behind earthly events. That doesn’t mean Revelation has nothing to say about the future.

      It means we shouldn’t treat every symbol as a literal piece of technology waiting to be invented. The first question is not, “What modern gadget does this predict?” but, “What did this vision reveal to the Christians who first received it?”

      666 Wasn’t a Barcode

      Mention the Mark of the Beast, and somebody will immediately point at microchips, vaccines, credit cards, or whatever technology frightened their uncle on Facebook last week.

      But what would John’s original readers have understood?

      Revelation was written to seven churches living under the shadow of the Roman Empire. Rome demanded more than taxes—it demanded loyalty. Emperors were honored as divine, their images appeared on coins, and civic festivals and trade associations often involved sacrifices to Rome’s gods. Refusing to participate could cost Christians business, social standing, and sometimes their lives.

      The Greek word translated “mark” is charagma: an engraved, stamped, or branded sign. John places it on the forehead or right hand, probably as a deliberate counterfeit of God’s seal upon His people in Revelation 7. It also echoes Deuteronomy 6, where God’s commands are symbolically placed on the hand and forehead.

      The message is about ownership and allegiance: Who shapes your thinking—your forehead? Whose will do you carry out—your hand?

      Then Comes 666

      Ancient letters also functioned as numbers, allowing names to be expressed as numerical totals—a practice called gematria. The leading historical explanation is that “Nero Caesar,” written in Hebrew letters, totals 666. An ancient manuscript variation reads 616, which fits a shorter Latin spelling of Nero’s name. That is strong evidence John was pointing toward Nero—or using the famously brutal emperor as the model for Rome’s “beastly” power. Bible Odyssey

      Most contemporary scholars agree that Revelation 13 must first be interpreted within this Roman setting, although they disagree over whether it also predicts a particular end-times ruler. But it’s important to remember that the symbols and images in John’s vision would have to have meaning and relevance to God’s people in all ages until the end.

      The mark was not presented as something people would receive accidentally while buying groceries. It represented knowingly choosing the beast’s system over faithfulness to God.

      That is interpretation: what John communicated to his original audience.

      Application asks how that truth confronts other generations. The beast’s mark can appear in different forms whenever governments, cultures, institutions, or economic systems demand the kind of loyalty that belongs to God alone.

      So What?

      So don’t waste your life hunting for three sixes hidden in a company logo. Ask the better question:

      What pressure could make you trade truth for acceptance, comfort, money, or safety?

      That is where the beast still leaves its mark.

      Tuesday Watchdog: Should AI Tell You What the Bible Means?

      Pastors are using AI—but don’t want it deciding what the Bible means

      New Barna research reported today finds an interesting divide among Protestant pastors. Only 5% completely reject using AI to help interpret difficult passages, but just 10% think AI should determine which interpretation of a disputed Scripture is correct. Pastors appear increasingly willing to use AI as a research assistant while resisting the idea of treating it as a theological authority.

      And this isn’t hypothetical. AI products now advertise sermon preparation, Bible studies, automatic Scripture detection, devotional writing and even sermon-series creation specifically to churches.

      So What?

      A concordance is a tool. Google is a tool. AI can be a tool. And it’s okay to use tools to help you understand the Bible.

      The danger isn’t asking AI, “What did this Greek word mean in the first century?” The danger is asking it, “Tell me what I’m supposed to believe,” and never opening the Bible yourself.

      Notice Paul said study. He didn’t say prompt.